Drone Origin Security Enhancement Act Advances in House

The House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday unanimously voted to advance two bills related to drones, blocking purchases of them from certain countries and creating a position at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to counter associated threats.

The “Drone Origin Security Enhancement Act” prohibits the DHS secretary from “operat[ing], provid[ing] financial assistance for, or enter[ing] into or renew[ing] a contract for the procurement” of unmanned aircraft systems from countries labeled as strategic competitors by the Department of Defense.

If approved, the bill would block DHS purchases from China’s DJI Technologies, the world’s largest manufacturer of drones.

“Numerous reports over the last few years suggest Chinese-made drones could potentially be used to send sensitive flight information to China-based companies where it could be easily accessed by the Chinese government,” Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) said during a committee vote on Wednesday.

Although the U.S. military has banned DJI drone purchases over security concerns, several other government agencies have made big purchases from the Chinese firm.

The Department of Interior has more than 500 DJI drones at its disposal for monitoring federal land and natural resources.

Local government entities, like the Los Angeles Fire Department, also rely on the drones produced in China.

“We are deeply disappointed in this move because it broadly and unfairly targets technology manufactured in China and would prevent the Department of Homeland Security from using the industry’s most advanced drone and drone-detection technology — which it already relies on – to support vital operations,” an official for DJI told The Hill.

“The most effective solution would require technology providers to meet clear standards for functionality, safety, and security before government agencies, like the Department of Homeland Security, can use drone technology in their operations.”

The firm controlled 74 percent of global market share in drone sales in 2018, according to Skylogic Research.

Waivers for drones produced in strategic competitor nations, such as Russia, would be available on a case-by-case basis and require from both the House and Senate Homeland Security committees.

The drone origin bill comes amid government wide scrutiny of contracts with Chinese firms over concerns that Beijing may access sensitive information.

The House panel also advanced a bill Wednesday that would create a role in the DHS for a “Countering Unmanned Aircraft Systems Coordinator.”

The official would be tasked with countering threats associated with drones, promoting anti-drone tech research and coordinating with the private sector.

Source: The Hill

 

2 comments

  1. Once again the Head in the Sand Legislature has spewed a useless and in fact damaging act of wrongheaded theories, and denied the US government access to the most technologically advanced drones available in that price range. US manufactured drones cost upwards of 10 times what DJI is selling their products for, and they do less than half as much.

    Again forgetting that the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has extensively reviewed and inspected DJI SOFTWARE and found NO evidence of nefarious code, and that DJI has bent over backwards to insure that updates and such are provided with full transparency, that wont suffice because it does not put money in their campaign accounts. But Companies that are getting their asses handed to them feel it is better to bribe than to INOVATE.

    Just take a look at the T16 they are releasing, nothing in the United States comes even close to the ability and features, this is without a doubt one of the most sophisticated systems every developed for crop management but we have to freak out because we cant begin to imagine we are not the best at everything.

    Instead of freaking out that the dronespace is Primarily Chinese, Accept it and go on about making sure the drones DONT report to china. Set up security systems and standards that must be met to insure that data does not go out. Thousands of companies use these systems and do exactly that. Get a Clue, Get a Life, start proactively protecting us by having that sort of data screened. Have EACH Update approved before release by an independent lab. Cant cost THAT Much, how much did we just spend to whack a terrorist with SOG troops?

  2. The House panel also advanced a bill Wednesday that would create a role in the DHS for a “Countering Unmanned Aircraft Systems Coordinator.”
    The official would be tasked with countering threats associated with drones, promoting anti-drone tech research and coordinating with the private sector.

    Wow, really, drones have been with us nearly a decade and we are finally getting around to looking at them as a threat? Companies have been building and deploying anti Drone systems for nearly as long as drones have been commercially available and all of a sudden the legislature is starting to act like this is something new?

    Clueless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *